- Brazil is rolling out a US $5.55bn credit line to shield exporters from looming US tariffs of up to 50%
- Brazil supplies around a third of the world’s coffee and sets the tone for arabica prices
- Coffee, long unsubsidised unlike other products such as wine, may be entering a new policy era
IN response to prospective American duties of up to 50% on a swathe of Brazilian goods – including coffee – the government has unveiled a rescue and rearmament plan for exporters: a 30bn-real (about US$5.55bn) credit line.
This is channelled through the existing Export Guarantee Fund (FGE), which is managed by state development bank BNDES, and includes an additional US $823M earmarked for smaller firms.
The plan, dubbed “Sovereign Brazil,” is available to any sector facing the new American wall and offers affordable loans, tax breaks and other measures, prioritising small businesses and those dealing in perishable foods. But the symbolism for coffee is hard to miss. Brazil supplies roughly around a third of the world’s coffee and is the price-setter for arabica; the United States is among its largest buyers.
If tariffs land, they could dissolve the very blends that anchor American supermarket shelves and café chains.
The package is designed to cushion two blows at once: financing and risk. Exporters hit by tariff uncertainty face longer sales cycles, fatter working-capital needs and pricier hedging. Research finds that rising trade uncertainty dampens export growth by straining firms’ working capital, particularly when transactions rely on cash-in-advance. It also triggers banks to shift credit away from smaller exporters toward larger importers and global value chain firms, amplifying the impact of trade shocks across the wider economy.
BNDES can smooth those peaks by insuring receivables, discounting export contracts and extending dollar-linked credit at subsidised spreads.
“In principle, a sizable credit line and risk‑sharing guarantees can ease liquidity pressures, lower financing costs for hedging and working capital, and help smooth shipment schedules,” says the International Coffee Organization’s statistics team for Coffee Intelligence.
“This support could be particularly relevant considering that, on average between 2020 and 2024, the United States accounted for 30% of its total coffee imports from Brazil, while 18% of Brazil’s coffee exports went to the U.S. The actual impact will depend on speed of deployment, eligibility criteria, pricing, bank intermediation capacity and exporters’ ability to access the facilities.”
The extra provision earmarked for small and mid-sized firms marks an intentional shift to offer wider national support. The credit line will bolster mid-tier traders whose balance-sheets are too slight for commercial banks in jittery moments, and who are at risk of losing American business.
President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva underscored the intention to support smaller players. “The line will mainly help small companies, but also large ones, which have more resilience. No one will be left unprotected from Trump’s tariffs. We will ensure the preservation of jobs,” he said in an interview with BandNews FM radio.
If the aim is to keep coffee flowing while buyers and sellers reprice their relationships, the tool is fit for purpose. The move also underscores that coffee remains a high priority for Brazil, and not just in light of tariffs.
“In my opinion, the tariffs have raised a red flag, both for exporters and producers,” says Augusto Borges Ferreira of Capadocia Coffees in Brazil. “What has been happening lately is that climate change is speaking much louder than tariffs, geopolitics, and wars.”
A look at the European wine sector’s subsidies
Coffee has long envied wine’s public policy. European winemakers benefit greatly from government subsidies: tax breaks, restructuring grants, promotion funds and – when needed – funding schemes for crisis distillation to dissipate wine gluts. In May of this year, the European Commission approved €5 bn in a French scheme to facilitate the export of wines and spirits to the US, in light of the US tariffs.
Coffee farmers, by contrast, mostly face the market. After the collapse of the International Coffee Agreement’s quota regime in 1989, prices hinged on weather, currency and speculation.
European wine-producing countries subsidise their wine producers, while coffee producing countries, often developing economies, do not have the capacity to do the same. In his seminal book, Coffee and Wine: Two Worlds Compared, Morten Scholer notes that these subsidies for coffee are too complex to calculate or evaluate.
Vanúsia Nogueira, Executive Director of the International Coffee Organization (ICO), suggested in a previous 2023 article that while subsidies help keep European winemakers competitive, they underscore the absence of similar support for coffee producers. Unlike wine, which benefits from EU-specific policies, coffee is largely grown in developing countries whose governments lack the capacity to subsidise production – making it a stark case of rich versus poor economies.
In fact, the 2020 Coffee Barometer issue quotes OLAM saying that “if coffee were a product of the developed world there would have been some price stabilisation mechanism put in place or, at the very least, there would have been subsidies at low prices.”
The size of companies in the industry also differs greatly. Some coffee companies are huge, holding a large portion of the world market. The largest wine companies, on the other hand, cover a small fraction of the global sector.
A few safety nets do still exist for coffee producers: Brazil’s long-standing minimum-price operations, concessional rural credit (the Plano Safra) and the coffee-specific Funcafé fund have offered seasonal finance, warehousing support and some income smoothing.
Colombia’s coffee tax funds research and extension; Vietnam banks on cheap credit and infrastructure. But the sums and certainties have never rivalled Europe’s wine politics.
Within that context, Brazil’s new export backstop marks a shift from “farm-gate” support to “border” policy – insurance, guarantees and liquidity that target the trade interface rather than the field. Tariff threats amplify premium buyers’ demand for reliability, but financing can substitute for margin erosion and stave off fire-sales of inventory.
It also changes competitive dynamics inside Brazil. Big houses can usually syndicate risk and lean on global banking lines, but cooperatives and regional exporters cannot. A publicly anchored guarantee lifts many boats at once, preserving competition and, in time, innovation – for example, soluble plants, quality upgrades, and origin-roasted formats.
The question is whether this will be a one-off salve, or the start of wine-like industrial policy for coffee.
Coffee touches many jobs in Brazil, exporters are visible, and Brazil’s share of world supply gives any policy outsized impact. Once installed, guarantee schemes are hard to unwind: private lenders price around them, firms plan with them, and governments bank on their leverage as tools of foreign-economic policy.
It’s possible that other producers could take note. Countries like Colombia, Vietnam, Ethiopia and Uganda could be next, with some angling for more value-addition at origin and guarantee-tied investments in soluble and roasting capacity.
A new model for coffee policy?
If the United States’ steep tariffs on Brazilian coffee remain in place, roasters will likely rethink blends, tilting toward Colombia, Central America and robusta from Indonesia and Uganda, for example.
Prices for those origins would rise, differentials would spike, and substitution would hit limits because Brazilian beans are the backbone of many blends. This would trigger higher retail prices and consumer discomfort.
Brazil, meanwhile, would divert more volume to Europe, China, Southeast Asia and the Middle East – markets where its exporters already have traction and where import regimes, for now, look friendlier. The new BNDES facility greases exactly that pivot: it lowers the cost of waiting out US uncertainty while deepening ties elsewhere.
“In recent years, producing countries such as Colombia have been buying a lot of coffee from Brazil, both commercial and specialty,” says Augusto. “I believe that now, with the tariffs, these purchases should increase, since Colombia’s rate is 10%, as well as Germany, which also re-exports.”
“On the other hand, we have China, which has been doubling its purchases of Brazilian coffee – an example of this is the quick approval for exports to China. The tariffs are a shot in the foot for the US, since the supply of coffee is smaller than global demand in the short and medium term. Tariffs are a two-way street, and producers and exporters need to change course and adjust the ‘sails of the ship.’”
For producers, a guarantee-rich ecosystem has two implications. First, it rewards organisational capacity. Cooperatives that can demonstrate traceability, finance and logistics will capture more of the subsidy’s benefits, anchoring regional clusters. Second, it encourages value-addition at origin. If exporters can finance inventories longer and hedge risk cheaper, building soluble lines, capsule-grade mills and even origin-roasting for nearby markets becomes less risky.
Globally, a Brazilian template would pull coffee policy toward the border. Rather than guaranteed prices in the interior, which can fuel overproduction, governments would insure transactions, underwrite trade credit and co-finance logistics.
“US tariffs turned on a yellow light not only for Brazil but also for other countries,” says Augusto. “They show that sometimes it’s necessary to take one step back in order to take two steps forward. Developing policies increasingly focused on where production actually happens is the remedy for reducing dependence on countries with tariffs like those of the US.”
“If the producer is strong, the country is strong; if the producer is weak, the country is weak. But in the end, everything comes down to supply and demand. A good policy theoretically guarantees producers stability to produce, but most of the time it doesn’t reach the hands of the producer.”
Brazil’s support vanishing once tariff tensions pass seems like an unlikely scenario. The government has discovered a lever that buffers a flagship export, tilts trade away from hostile markets and helps smaller firms survive shocks. The risk is complacency: guarantees cannot fix climate volatility, labour shortages or the need to move up the value curve.
The opportunity is strategic: if used to accelerate efficiency and value-addition, not to freeze the status quo, Brazil’s move could mark a decisive shift for coffee policy.
Coffee Intelligence
Want to read more articles like this? Sign up for our newsletter here.
